decomposer: record implementation detail for 8 step(s)
Some checks failed
validation / verify (push) Failing after 14s

This commit is contained in:
2026-09-01 20:01:44 +00:00
parent 7926fabc37
commit 3d468dcff7
8 changed files with 23 additions and 32 deletions

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
# Step 0 — Implementation Detail # Step 0 — Implementation Detail
1. Recorded functional requirements for authenticated API, transactional persistence, asynchronous events, retries/dead lettering, observability, and repeatable Terraform. 1. Created docs/requirements.md with categorized discovery outputs.
2. Recorded availability, latency, security, scalability, auditability, and no-provisioning validation targets. 2. Recorded the absent application-specific request as a baseline reference-architecture assumption.
3. Separated constraints, assumptions, and unresolved production questions into requirements.md. 3. Set Product selection deferred to true and listed decision-blocking questions.
4. Set product_selection_deferred to true in requirements.md and workflow.yaml.

View File

@@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
# Step 1 — Implementation Detail # Step 1 — Implementation Detail
1. Mapped the confirmed baseline to Cloud Run, Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL, Pub/Sub, Artifact Registry, Secret Manager, Cloud Logging, Cloud Monitoring, Cloud Trace, IAM, and Service Usage. 1. Created docs/architecture.md describing request flow, security, reliability, and Terraform decisions.
2. Documented request, persistence, event, retry/dead-letter, identity, and observability flows in architecture.md. 2. Created architecture.mmd covering clients, Cloud Run, Firestore, Storage, Pub/Sub, worker, observability, registry, and VPC egress.
3. Added the architecture.mmd Mermaid flowchart and embedded an equivalent diagram in the guide. 3. Added Terraform versions, variables, resources, outputs, API enablement, IAM identity, networking, data services, and Cloud Run.
4. Added Terraform for service enablement, Artifact Registry, Cloud SQL, Pub/Sub topics/subscription, Secret Manager placeholder, runtime service account, and Cloud Run API/worker services.
5. Parameterised project, region, name, images, SQL tier, HA, and deletion protection; supplied terraform.tfvars.example without secrets.

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
# Step 2 — Implementation Detail # Step 2 — Implementation Detail
1. Declared the exact checks in workflow.yaml and VALIDATION.md: Terraform 1.6+ formatting, backend-disabled initialization, Terraform validation, offline artifact validation, and pytest. 1. Added scripts/validate.sh using Terraform fmt, backendless init, validate, optional refresh-free plan, and Python unittest.
2. Added scripts/validate_artifacts.py to check required files, guide sections, and Mermaid graph presence without cloud calls. 2. Added tests/test_artifacts.py for requirements, architecture, Mermaid, Terraform, and guide invariants.
3. Added tests/test_package.py to execute the package validator and check that example configuration contains placeholders rather than secret values. 3. Documented validation status as not_run in this generation environment because tools, provider downloads, and credentials were unavailable.
4. Recorded validation status and the distinction between offline validation and an operator-supplied future terraform plan in the guide.

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,4 @@
# Step 3 — Implementation Detail # Step 3 — Implementation Detail
1. Combined requirements and assumptions from requirements.md into the guide. 1. Created solution-architecture-guide.md with scope, requirements links, selected products, embedded Mermaid, IaC usage, validation, verification, and risks.
2. Combined product choices and architecture description from architecture.md into the guide. 2. Included explicit non-deployment and generation-environment limitations.
3. Embedded the Mermaid diagram and linked the source diagram and Terraform directory.
4. Added a validation table, commands, non-provisioning statement, operational risks, and production follow-up gates.

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,4 @@
# Step 4 — Implementation Detail # Step 4 — Implementation Detail
1. Created solution-architecture-guide.md at repository root. 1. Persisted solution-architecture-guide.md in the scaffold commit.
2. Included a delivery-verification section covering requirements, products, architecture, diagram, Terraform, and validation evidence. 2. Documented guide persistence in the guide's repository-verification section.
3. Made scripts/validate_artifacts.py assert the guide path and required sections.
4. Committed the guide in the single generated repository commit.

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Step 5 — Implementation Detail # Step 5 — Implementation Detail
1. Added workflow.yaml identifying the workflow-agent template URL and target repository. 1. Declared the workflow-agent source template in workflow.yaml.
2. Mapped requirements, architecture, validation, and packaging phases to manifest steps 07. 2. Mapped four phases to steps 03 and listed their inputs and outputs.
3. Declared phase inputs, outputs, validation commands, and provisioning=false. 3. Declared step 47 repository and publication checks.
4. Added required-artifact checks in scripts/validate_artifacts.py and package tests in tests/test_package.py. 4. Included requirements, architecture, Mermaid, Terraform, validation, tests, and guide artifacts.

View File

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
# Step 6 — Implementation Detail # Step 6 — Implementation Detail
1. Scaffolded the repository once with all 16 workflow and architecture artifacts. 1. Scaffolded the repository once with all 15 files.
2. Committed requirements, architecture, Mermaid, Terraform, validation, workflow, tests, and guide together. 2. Committed all workflow, architecture, IaC, validation, test, and guide content together.
3. Used the returned repository URL as the publication target. 3. Recorded the remote repository URL for publication verification.

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
# Step 7 — Implementation Detail # Step 7 — Implementation Detail
1. Confirmed the scaffold tool returned the target repository URL after committing all generated files. 1. Added workflow.yaml checks requiring the published revision to contain workflow.yaml and solution-architecture-guide.md.
2. Confirmed the required guide and workflow artifacts were included in the committed file set. 2. Added guide statements describing revision/content comparison required for remote verification.
3. Recorded the remote URL for downstream revision/content verification. 3. Reported the scaffold commit as the publication revision; independent remote hash comparison was not executable through the available tools.
4. Noted that the scaffold result did not expose a commit hash, so a revision identifier could not be independently reported.