decomposer: generate deliverable files for Discover and structure the solution's functional requirements, non-functional requirements, constraints, assumptions, and open questions without selecting cloud products.; Select Google Cloud products from the confirmed requirements and produce the solution architecture, Mermaid diagram, architecture description, and Terraform infrastructure-as-code.; Validate the Terraform infrastructure and architecture artifacts without deploying resources by running formatting checks, Terraform validation, and a dry-run or plan-oriented deployment check.; Package the approved requirements, architecture, Mermaid diagram, Terraform IaC, and validation results into solution-architecture-guide.md in the gcp_solution_architecture_agent repository.; Verify that the gcp_solution_architecture_agent repository contains the packaged solution-architecture-guide.md with the approved workflow outputs.; Verify that the repository is derived from the workflow_agent template and implements the complete four-phase Google Cloud solution architecture workflow alongside the packaged guide.; Publish the verified gcp_solution_architecture_agent repository with its completed workflow implementation and solution architecture guide.; Verify that the published repository revision contains the completed workflow implementation and solution architecture guide.
Some checks failed
validation / verify (push) Failing after 9s
Some checks failed
validation / verify (push) Failing after 9s
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,44 +1,16 @@
|
||||
# Steps 1–2 — selected architecture and validation design
|
||||
# Architecture decision record
|
||||
|
||||
The confirmed baseline uses a managed container API, a transactional managed relational datastore, a durable event bus, a serverless event worker, and centralized observability. The API publishes an event after a successful write. The worker is idempotent, acknowledges only after durable processing, and routes exhausted retries to a dead-letter topic. Public access is restricted to HTTPS and application identity; deployment identities are separate from runtime identities.
|
||||
|
||||
## Selected Google Cloud products
|
||||
- Cloud Run: stateless HTTPS API and event worker.
|
||||
- Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL: transactional relational persistence.
|
||||
- Pub/Sub: durable asynchronous events and dead-letter handling.
|
||||
- Artifact Registry: container image repository.
|
||||
- Secret Manager: runtime secret references (values supplied out of band).
|
||||
- Cloud Logging and Cloud Monitoring: logs, metrics, alerting foundations.
|
||||
- Cloud Trace: distributed request tracing.
|
||||
- IAM and Service Usage: least privilege and API enablement.
|
||||
|
||||
- Cloud Run for the stateless HTTPS ingestion and worker services.
|
||||
- Pub/Sub for durable asynchronous order events and a dead-letter topic.
|
||||
- Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL for transactional order state.
|
||||
- Secret Manager for database credentials and application secrets.
|
||||
- Artifact Registry as the container image source.
|
||||
- Cloud Logging, Cloud Monitoring, and Cloud Trace for observability.
|
||||
- IAM and a dedicated service account for least-privilege workload identity.
|
||||
- Serverless VPC Access and a VPC network for controlled access to the database.
|
||||
|
||||
## Mermaid diagram
|
||||
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
flowchart LR
|
||||
Client[Authenticated client] --> Run[Cloud Run: order-api]
|
||||
Run --> Pub[Pub/Sub: orders]
|
||||
Pub --> Worker[Cloud Run: order-worker]
|
||||
Pub --> DLQ[Pub/Sub: orders-dead-letter]
|
||||
Run --> SQL[(Cloud SQL PostgreSQL)]
|
||||
Worker --> SQL
|
||||
Run -. secrets .-> SM[Secret Manager]
|
||||
Worker -. secrets .-> SM
|
||||
Run -. egress .-> VPC[Serverless VPC Access / VPC]
|
||||
Worker -. egress .-> VPC
|
||||
Run --> Obs[Logging / Monitoring / Trace]
|
||||
Worker --> Obs
|
||||
CI[CI: fmt, validate, plan] --> TF[Terraform]
|
||||
TF --> Run
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Architecture description
|
||||
|
||||
Clients call the authenticated `order-api` service. The API validates the request, writes an idempotency/order record to PostgreSQL, publishes an order event, and acknowledges the request. The worker consumes events independently, updates transactional state, and allows failed messages to be retained in the dead-letter topic for replay. Both services use separate runtime identities in production; the reference Terraform uses one explicitly scoped identity to keep the sample small and documents the split as a hardening action.
|
||||
|
||||
Cloud Run provides stateless horizontal scaling. Pub/Sub absorbs bursts and decouples downstream work. Cloud SQL supplies relational transactions; its private IP and VPC path are intended for production hardening. Secret Manager avoids embedding credentials. Managed logging, monitoring, and tracing provide operational evidence.
|
||||
|
||||
The initial topology is single-region. Multi-region failover, custom domain/edge policy, backup configuration, and application-level authentication integration remain deployment decisions because the open questions are unresolved.
|
||||
|
||||
## Validation design
|
||||
|
||||
`terraform fmt -check`, backendless `terraform init`, and `terraform validate` are run in CI. `scripts/validate_artifacts.py` checks that the requirements, architecture, Mermaid diagram, Terraform, and guide contain the required sections and that no product names occur in the product-neutral requirements section. No apply is used. A credentialed `terraform plan` is optional and must use a disposable plan file.
|
||||
## Trade-offs
|
||||
Cloud Run reduces operational burden and scales to zero, at the cost of cold starts and request/runtime limits. Cloud SQL provides relational transactions but needs sizing, backups, and HA decisions. Pub/Sub provides at-least-once delivery, so consumers must be idempotent. Terraform modules are deliberately small and explicit to keep the reference deployable and reviewable.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user