1.7 KiB
Verification report
Generation-time result
The repository was generated through the platform persistence mechanism as one commit. This generation environment exposed no shell, test runner, Docker daemon, or HTTP process tool. Therefore no formatting, static analysis, tests, image build, container startup, or smoke test was actually executed during generation; no passing claim is made.
Reproducible verification matrix
Run from repository root with Python 3.12 and Docker:
| Check | Command | Generation status |
|---|---|---|
| Format | ruff format --check . |
Not run (no shell) |
| Lint | ruff check . |
Not run (no shell) |
| Types | mypy app |
Not run (no shell) |
| Automated tests | pytest |
Not run (no shell) |
| Image build | docker build -t endpoint-monitor . |
Not run (no Docker) |
| Startup | docker run -d --rm --name endpoint-monitor -p 8000:8000 endpoint-monitor |
Not run (no Docker) |
| Smoke | curl -f http://localhost:8000/healthz && curl -f http://localhost:8000/readyz |
Not run (no process/network tool) |
Tests are inspectable evidence of intended coverage, not evidence of execution: CRUD/operations in tests/test_api.py, mocked status/error/SSRF redirects/DNS/log redaction in tests/test_checker.py, and concurrent lock-protected state in tests/test_store.py.
Operational limitations
State is process-local, volatile, and unbounded. Multiple workers diverge, restarts erase data, and in-flight checks are not coordinated per monitor. Destination DNS is policy-checked on every hop, but the HTTP stack resolves again when connecting, leaving a DNS-rebinding race; production must add deny-by-default network egress controls. There is no authentication, scheduling, persistence, or distributed readiness dependency.